We are all wise. The difference between persons is not in wisdom but in art. I
knew, in an academical club, a person who always deferred to me; who, seeing my
whim for writing, fancied that my experiences had somewhat superior; whilst I
saw that his experiences were as good as mine. Give them to me and I would make
the same use of them. He held the old; he holds the new; I had the habit of
tacking together the old and the new which he did not use to exercise. This may
hold in the great examples. Perhaps if we should meet Shakspeare we should not
be conscious of any steep inferiority; no, but of a great equality,--only that
he possessed a strange skill of using, of classifying, his facts, which we
lacked. For notwithstanding our utter incapacity to produce anything like Hamlet
and Othello, see the perfect reception this wit and immense knowledge of life
and liquid eloquence find in us all.
If you gather apples in the sunshine, or make hay, or hoe corn, and then retire
within doors and shut your eyes and press them with your hand, you shall still
see apples hanging in the bright light with boughs and leaves thereto, or the
tasselled grass, or the corn-flags, and this for five or six hours afterwards.
There lie the impressions on the retentive organ, though you knew it not. So
lies the whole series of natural images with which your life has made you
acquainted, in your memory, though you know it not; and a thrill of passion
flashes light on their dark chamber, and the active power seizes instantly the
fit image, as the word of its momentary thought.
It is long ere we discover how rich we are. Our history, we are sure, is quite
tame: we have nothing to write, nothing to infer. But our wiser years still run
back to the despised recollections of childhood, and always we are fishing up
some wonderful article out of that pond; until by and by we begin to suspect
that the biography of the one foolish person we know is, in reality, nothing
less than the miniature paraphrase of the hundred volumes of the Universal
History.
In the intellect constructive, which we popularly designate by the word Genius,
we observe the same balance of two elements as in intellect receptive. The
constructive intellect produces thoughts, sentences, poems, plans, designs,
systems. It is the generation of the mind, the marriage of thought with nature.
To genius must always go two gifts, the thought and the publication. The first
is revelation, always a miracle, which no frequency of occurrence or incessant
study can ever familiarize, but which must always leave the inquirer stupid with
wonder. It is the advent of truth into the world, a form of thought now for the
first time bursting into the universe, a child of the old eternal soul, a piece
of genuine and immeasurable greatness. It seems, for the time, to inherit all
that has yet existed and to dictate to the unborn. It affects every thought of
man and goes to fashion every institution. But to make it available it needs a
vehicle or art by which it is conveyed to men. To be communicable it must become
picture or sensible object. We must learn the language of facts. The most
wonderful inspirations die with their subject if he has no hand to paint them to
the senses. The ray of light passes invisible through space and only when it
falls on an object is it seen. When the spiritual energy is directed on
something outward, then it is a thought. The relation between it and you first
makes you, the value of you, apparent to me. The rich inventive genius of the
painter must be smothered and lost for want of the power of drawing, and in our
happy hours we should be inexhaustible poets if once we could break through the
silence into adequate rhyme. As all men have some access to primary truth, so
all have some art or power of communication in their head, but only in the
artist does it descend into the hand. There is an inequality, whose laws we do
not yet know, between two men and between two moments of the same man, in
respect to this faculty. In common hours we have the same facts as in the
uncommon or inspired, but they do not sit for their portraits; they are not
detached, but lie in a web. The thought of genius is spontaneous; but the power
of picture or expression, in the most enriched and flowing nature, implies a
mixture of will, a certain control over the spontaneous states, without which no
production is possible. It is a conversion of all nature into the rhetoric of
thought, under the eye of judgment, with a strenuous exercise of choice. And yet
the imaginative vocabulary seems to be spontaneous also. It does not flow from
experience only or mainly, but from a richer source. Not by any conscious
imitation of particular forms are the grand strokes of the painter executed, but
by repairing to the fountain-head of all forms in his mind. Who is the first
drawing-master? Without instruction we know very well the ideal of the human
form. A child knows if an arm or a leg be distorted in a picture; if the
attitude be natural or grand or mean; though he has never received any
instruction in drawing or heard any conversation on the subject, nor can himself
draw with correctness a single feature. A good form strikes all eyes pleasantly,
long before they have any science on the subject, and a beautiful face sets
twenty hearts in palpitation, prior to all consideration of the mechanical
proportions of the features and head. We may owe to dreams some light on the
fountain of this skill; for as soon as we let our will go and let the
unconscious states ensue, see what cunning draughtsmen we are! We entertain
ourselves with wonderful forms of men, of women, of animals, of gardens, of
woods and of monsters, and the mystic pencil wherewith we then draw has no
awkwardness or inexperience, no meagreness or poverty; it can design well and
group well; its composition is full of art, its colors are well laid on and the
whole canvas which it paints is lifelike and apt to touch us with terror, with
tenderness, with desire and with grief. Neither are the artist's copies from
experience ever mere copies, but always touched and softened by tints from this
ideal domain.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |