Let a man then know his worth, and keep things under his feet. Let him not peep
or steal, or skulk up and down with the air of a charity-boy, a bastard, or an
interloper in the world which exists for him. But the man in the street, finding
no worth in himself which corresponds to the force which built a tower or
sculptured a marble god, feels poor when he looks on these. To him a palace, a
statue, or a costly book have an alien and forbidding air, much like a gay
equipage, and seem to say like that, 'Who are you, Sir?' Yet they all are his,
suitors for his notice, petitioners to his faculties that they will come out and
take possession. The picture waits for my verdict; it is not to command me, but
I am to settle its claims to praise. That popular fable of the sot who was
picked up dead drunk in the street, carried to the duke's house, washed and
dressed and laid in the duke's bed, and, on his waking, treated with all
obsequious ceremony like the duke, and assured that he had been insane, owes its
popularity to the fact that it symbolizes so well the state of man, who is in
the world a sort of sot, but now and then wakes up, exercises his reason and
finds himself a true prince.
Our reading is mendicant and sycophantic. In history our imagination plays us
false. Kingdom and lordship, power and estate, are a gaudier vocabulary than
private John and Edward in a small house and common day's work; but the things
of life are the same to both; the sum total of both is the same. Why all this
deference to Alfred and Scanderbeg and Gustavus? Suppose they were virtuous; did
they wear out virtue? As great a stake depends on your private act to-day, as
followed their public and renowned steps. When private men shall act with
original views, the lustre will be transferred from the actions of kings to
those of gentlemen.
The world has been instructed by its kings, who have so magnetized the eyes of
nations. It has been taught by this colossal symbol the mutual reverence that is
due from man to man. The joyful loyalty with which men have everywhere suffered
the king, the noble, or the great proprietor to walk among them by a law of his
own, make his own scale of men and things and reverse theirs, pay for benefits
not with money but with honor, and represent the law in his person, was the
hieroglyphic by which they obscurely signified their consciousness of their own
right and comeliness, the right of every man.
The magnetism which all original action exerts is explained when we inquire the
reason of self-trust. Who is the Trustee? What is the aboriginal Self, on which
a universal reliance may be grounded? What is the nature and power of that
science-baffling star, without parallax, without calculable elements, which
shoots a ray of beauty even into trivial and impure actions, if the least mark
of independence appear? The inquiry leads us to that source, at once the essence
of genius, of virtue, and of life, which we call Spontaneity or Instinct. We
denote this primary wisdom as Intuition, whilst all later teachings are
tuitions. In that deep force, the last fact behind which analysis cannot go, all
things find their common origin. For the sense of being which in calm hours
rises, we know not how, in the soul, is not diverse from things, from space,
from light, from time, from man, but one with them and proceeds obviously from
the same source whence their life and being also proceed. We first share the
life by which things exist and afterwards see them as appearances in nature and
forget that we have shared their cause. Here is the fountain of action and of
thought. Here are the lungs of that inspiration which giveth man wisdom and
which cannot be denied without impiety and atheism. We lie in the lap of immense
intelligence, which makes us receivers of its truth and organs of its activity.
When we discern justice, when we discern truth, we do nothing of ourselves, but
allow a passage to its beams. If we ask whence this comes, if we seek to pry
into the soul that causes, all philosophy is at fault. Its presence or its
absence is all we can affirm. Every man discriminates between the voluntary acts
of his mind and his involuntary perceptions, and knows that to his involuntary
perceptions a perfect faith is due. He may err in the expression of them, but he
knows that these things are so, like day and night, not to be disputed. My
wilful actions and acquisitions are but roving;--the idlest reverie, the
faintest native emotion, command my curiosity and respect. Thoughtless people
contradict as readily the statement of perceptions as of opinions, or rather
much more readily; for they do not distinguish between perception and notion.
They fancy that I choose to see this or that thing. But perception is not
whimsical, but fatal. If I see a trait, my children will see it after me, and in
course of time all mankind,-- although it may chance that no one has seen it
before me. For my perception of it is as much a fact as the sun.
The relations of the soul to the divine spirit are so pure that it is profane to
seek to interpose helps. It must be that when God speaketh he should
communicate, not one thing, but all things; should fill the world with his
voice; should scatter forth light, nature, time, souls, from the centre of the
present thought; and new date and new create the whole. Whenever a mind is
simple and receives a divine wisdom, old things pass away,--means, teachers,
texts, temples fall; it lives now, and absorbs past and future into the present
hour. All things are made sacred by relation to it,--one as much as another. All
things are dissolved to their centre by their cause, and in the universal
miracle petty and particular miracles disappear. If therefore a man claims to
know and speak of God and carries you backward to the phraseology of some old
mouldered nation in another country, in another world, believe him not. Is the
acorn better than the oak which is its fulness and completion? Is the parent
better than the child into whom he has cast his ripened being? Whence then this
worship of the past? The centuries are conspirators against the sanity and
authority of the soul. Time and space are but physiological colors which the eye
makes, but the soul is light: where it is, is day; where it was, is night; and
history is an impertinence and an injury if it be any thing more than a cheerful
apologue or parable of my being and becoming.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |