To embroil the confusion, and make it impossible to arrive at any general
statement,--when we have insisted on the imperfection of individuals, our
affections and our experience urge that every individual is entitled to honor,
and a very generous treatment is sure to be repaid. A recluse sees only two or
three persons, and allows them all their room; they spread themselves at large.
The statesman looks at many, and compares the few habitually with others, and
these look less. Yet are they not entitled to this generosity of reception? and
is not munificence the means of insight? For though gamesters say that the cards
beat all the players, though they were never so skilful, yet in the contest we
are now considering, the players are also the game, and share the power of the
cards. If you criticise a fine genius, the odds are that you are out of your
reckoning, and instead of the poet, are censuring your own caricature of him.
For there is somewhat spheral and infinite in every man, especially in every
genius, which, if you can come very near him, sports with all your limitations.
For rightly every man is a channel through which heaven floweth, and whilst I
fancied I was criticising him, I was censuring or rather terminating my own
soul. After taxing Goethe as a courtier, artificial, unbelieving, worldly,--I
took up this book of Helena, and found him an Indian of the wilderness, a piece
of pure nature like an apple or an oak, large as morning or night, and virtuous
as a brier-rose.
But care is taken that the whole tune shall be played. If we were not kept among
surfaces, every thing would be large and universal; now the excluded attributes
burst in on us with the more brightness that they have been excluded. "Your turn
now, my turn next," is the rule of the game. The universality being hindered in
its primary form, comes in the secondary form of all sides; the points come in
succession to the meridian, and by the speed of rotation a new whole is formed.
Nature keeps herself whole and her representation complete in the experience of
each mind. She suffers no seat to be vacant in her college. It is the secret of
the world that all things subsist and do not die but only retire a little from
sight and afterwards return again. Whatever does not concern us is concealed
from us. As soon as a person is no longer related to our present well-being, he
is concealed, or dies, as we say. Really, all things and persons are related to
us, but according to our nature they act on us not at once but in succession,
and we are made aware of their presence one at a time. All persons, all things
which we have known, are here present, and many more than we see; the world is
full. As the ancient said, the world is a plenum or solid; and if we saw all
things that really surround us we should be imprisoned and unable to move. For
though nothing is impassable to the soul, but all things are pervious to it and
like highways, yet this is only whilst the soul does not see them. As soon as
the soul sees any object, it stops before that object. Therefore, the divine
Providence which keeps the universe open in every direction to the soul,
conceals all the furniture and all the persons that do not concern a particular
soul, from the senses of that individual. Through solidest eternal things the
man finds his road as if they did not subsist, and does not once suspect their
being. As soon as he needs a new object, suddenly he beholds it, and no longer
attempts to pass through it, but takes another way. When he has exhausted for
the time the nourishment to be drawn from any one person or thing, that object
is withdrawn from his observation, and though still in his immediate
neighborhood, he does not suspect its presence. Nothing is dead: men feign
themselves dead, and endure mock funerals and mournful obituaries, and there
they stand looking out of the window, sound and well, in some new and strange
disguise. Jesus is not dead; he is very well alive: nor John, nor Paul, nor
Mahomet, nor Aristotle; at times we believe we have seen them all, and could
easily tell the names under which they go.
If we cannot make voluntary and conscious steps in the admirable science of
universals, let us see the parts wisely, and infer the genius of nature from the
best particulars with a becoming charity. What is best in each kind is an index
of what should be the average of that thing. Love shows me the opulence of
nature, by disclosing to me in my friend a hidden wealth, and I infer an equal
depth of good in every other direction. It is commonly said by farmers that a
good pear or apple costs no more time or pains to rear than a poor one; so I
would have no work of art, no speech, or action, or thought, or friend, but the
best.
The end and the means, the gamester and the game, --life is made up of the
intermixture and reaction of these two amicable powers, whose marriage appears
beforehand monstrous, as each denies and tends to abolish the other. We must
reconcile the contradictions as we can, but their discord and their concord
introduce wild absurdities into our thinking and speech. No sentence will hold
the whole truth, and the only way in which we can be just, is by giving
ourselves the lie; Speech is better than silence; silence is better than
speech;--All things are in contact; every atom has a sphere of
repulsion;--Things are, and are not, at the same time;--and the like. All the
universe over, there is but one thing, this old Two-Face, creator-creature,
mind-matter, right-wrong, of which any proposition may be affirmed or denied.
Very fitly therefore I assert that every man is a partialist, that nature
secures him as an instrument by self-conceit, preventing the tendencies to
religion and science; and now further assert, that, each man's genius being
nearly and affectionately explored, he is justified in his individuality, as his
nature is found to be immense; and now I add that every man is a universalist
also, and, as our earth, whilst it spins on its own axis, spins all the time
around the sun through the celestial spaces, so the least of its rational
children, the most dedicated to his private affair, works out, though as it were
under a disguise, the universal problem. We fancy men are individuals; so are
pumpkins; but every pumpkin in the field goes through every point of pumpkin
history. The rabid democrat, as soon as he is senator and rich man, has ripened
beyond possibility of sincere radicalism, and unless he can resist the sun, he
must be conservative the remainder of his days. Lord Eldon said in his old age
that "if he were to begin life again, he would be damned but he would begin as
agitator."
We hide this universality if we can, but it appears at all points. We are as
ungrateful as children. There is nothing we cherish and strive to draw to us but
in some hour we turn and rend it. We keep a running fire of sarcasm at ignorance
and the life of the senses; then goes by, perchance, a fair girl, a piece of
life, gay and happy, and making the commonest offices beautiful by the energy
and heart with which she does them; and seeing this we admire and love her and
them, and say, 'Lo! a genuine creature of the fair earth, not dissipated or too
early ripened by books, philosophy, religion, society, or care!' insinuating a
treachery and contempt for all we had so long loved and wrought in ourselves and
others.
If we could have any security against moods! If the profoundest prophet could be
holden to his words, and the hearer who is ready to sell all and join the
crusade could have any certificate that tomorrow his prophet shall not unsay his
testimony! But the Truth sits veiled there on the Bench, and never interposes an
adamantine syllable; and the most sincere and revolutionary doctrine, put as if
the ark of God were carried forward some furlongs, and planted there for the
succor of the world, shall in a few weeks be coldly set aside by the same
speaker, as morbid; "I thought I was right, but I was not,"--and the same
immeasurable credulity demanded for new audacities. If we were not of all
opinions! if we did not in any moment shift the platform on which we stand, and
look and speak from another! if there could be any regulation, any
'one-hour-rule,' that a man should never leave his point of view without sound
of trumpet. I am always insincere, as always knowing there are other moods.
How sincere and confidential we can be, saying all that lies in the mind, and
yet go away feeling that all is yet unsaid, from the incapacity of the parties
to know each other, although they use the same words! My companion assumes to
know my mood and habit of thought, and we go on from explanation to explanation
until all is said which words can, and we leave matters just as they were at
first, because of that vicious assumption. Is it that every man believes every
other to be an incurable partialist, and himself a universalist? I talked
yesterday with a pair of philosophers; I endeavored to show my good men that I
love everything by turns and nothing long; that I loved the centre, but doated
on the superficies; that I loved man, if men seemed to me mice and rats; that I
revered saints, but woke up glad that the old pagan world stood its ground and
died hard; that I was glad of men of every gift and nobility, but would not live
in their arms. Could they but once understand that I loved to know that they
existed, and heartily wished them God-speed, yet, out of my poverty of life and
thought, had no word or welcome for them when they came to see me, and could
well consent to their living in Oregon, for any claim I felt on them,--it would
be a great satisfaction.
![]() |
![]() |