5. GIFTS.
Gifts of one who loved me,--
'T was high time they came;
When he ceased to love me,
Time they stopped for shame.
V. GIFTS.
IT is said that the world is in a state of bankruptcy; that the world owes the
world more than the world can pay, and ought to go into chancery and be sold. I
do not think this general insolvency, which involves in some sort all the
population, to be the reason of the difficulty experienced at Christmas and New
Year and other times, in bestowing gifts; since it is always so pleasant to be
generous, though very vexatious to pay debts. But the impediment lies in the
choosing. If at any time it comes into my head that a present is due from me to
somebody, I am puzzled what to give, until the opportunity is gone. Flowers and
fruits are always fit presents; flowers, because they are a proud assertion that
a ray of beauty outvalues all the utilities of the world. These gay natures
contrast with the somewhat stern countenance of ordinary nature: they are like
music heard out of a work-house. Nature does not cocker us; we are children, not
pets; she is not fond; everything is dealt to us without fear or favor, after
severe universal laws. Yet these delicate flowers look like the frolic and
interference of love and beauty. Men use to tell us that we love flattery even
though we are not deceived by it, because it shows that we are of importance
enough to be courted. Something like that pleasure, the flowers give us: what am
I to whom these sweet hints are addressed? Fruits are acceptable gifts, because
they are the flower of commodities, and admit of fantastic values being attached
to them. If a man should send to me to come a hundred miles to visit him and
should set before me a basket of fine summer-fruit, I should think there was
some proportion between the labor and the reward.
For common gifts, necessity makes pertinences and beauty every day, and one is
glad when an imperative leaves him no option; since if the man at the door have
no shoes, you have not to consider whether you could procure him a paint-box.
And as it is always pleasing to see a man eat bread, or drink water, in the
house or out of doors, so it is always a great satisfaction to supply these
first wants. Necessity does everything well. In our condition of universal
dependence it seems heroic to let the petitioner be the judge of his necessity,
and to give all that is asked, though at great inconvenience. If it be a
fantastic desire, it is better to leave to others the office of punishing him. I
can think of many parts I should prefer playing to that of the Furies. Next to
things of necessity, the rule for a gift, which one of my friends prescribed, is
that we might convey to some person that which properly belonged to his
character, and was easily associated with him in thought. But our tokens of
compliment and love are for the most part barbarous. Rings and other jewels are
not gifts, but apologies for gifts. The only gift is a portion of thyself. Thou
must bleed for me. Therefore the poet brings his poem; the shepherd, his lamb;
the farmer, corn; the miner, a gem; the sailor, coral and shells; the painter,
his picture; the girl, a handkerchief of her own sewing. This is right and
pleasing, for it restores society in so far to its primary basis, when a man's
biography is conveyed in his gift, and every man's wealth is an index of his
merit. But it is a cold lifeless business when you go to the shops to buy me
something which does not represent your life and talent, but a goldsmith's. This
is fit for kings, and rich men who represent kings, and a false state of
property, to make presents of gold and silver stuffs, as a kind of symbolical
sin-offering, or payment of black-mail.
The law of benefits is a difficult channel, which requires careful sailing, or
rude boats. It is not the office of a man to receive gifts. How dare you give
them? We wish to be self-sustained. We do not quite forgive a giver. The hand
that feeds us is in some danger of being bitten. We can receive anything from
love, for that is a way of receiving it from ourselves; but not from any one who
assumes to bestow. We sometimes hate the meat which we eat, because there seems
something of degrading dependence in living by it:--
"Brother, if Jove to thee a present make,
Take heed that from his hands thou nothing take."
We ask the whole. Nothing less will content us. We arraign society if it do not
give us, besides earth and fire and water, opportunity, love, reverence, and
objects of veneration.
He is a good man who can receive a gift well. We are either glad or sorry at a
gift, and both emotions are unbecoming. Some violence I think is done, some
degradation borne, when I rejoice or grieve at a gift. I am sorry when my
independence is invaded, or when a gift comes from such as do not know my
spirit, and so the act is not supported; and if the gift pleases me overmuch,
then I should be ashamed that the donor should read my heart, and see that I
love his commodity, and not him. The gift, to be true, must be the flowing of
the giver unto me, correspondent to my flowing unto him. When the waters are at
level, then my goods pass to him, and his to me. All his are mine, all mine his.
I say to him, How can you give me this pot of oil or this flagon of wine when
all your oil and wine is mine, which belief of mine this gift seems to deny?
Hence the fitness of beautiful, not useful things, for gifts. This giving is
flat usurpation, and therefore when the beneficiary is ungrateful, as all
beneficiaries hate all Timons, not at all considering the value of the gift but
looking back to the greater store it was taken from,--I rather sympathize with
the beneficiary than with the anger of my lord Timon. For the expectation of
gratitude is mean, and is continually punished by the total insensibility of the
obliged person. It is a great happiness to get off without injury and
heart-burning from one who has had the ill-luck to be served by you. It is a
very onerous business, this of being served, and the debtor naturally wishes to
give you a slap. A golden text for these gentlemen is that which I so admire in
the Buddhist, who never thanks, and who says, "Do not flatter your benefactors."
The reason of these discords I conceive to be that there is no commensurability
between a man and any gift. You cannot give anything to a magnanimous person.
After you have served him he at once puts you in debt by his magnanimity. The
service a man renders his friend is trivial and selfish compared with the
service he knows his friend stood in readiness to yield him, alike before he had
begun to serve his friend, and now also. Compared with that good-will I bear my
friend, the benefit it is in my power to render him seems small. Besides, our
action on each other, good as well as evil, is so incidental and at random that
we can seldom hear the acknowledgments of any person who would thank us for a
benefit, without some shame and humiliation. We can rarely strike a direct
stroke, but must be content with an oblique one; we seldom have the satisfaction
of yielding a direct benefit which is directly received. But rectitude scatters
favors on every side without knowing it, and receives with wonder the thanks of
all people.
I fear to breathe any treason against the majesty of love, which is the genius
and god of gifts, and to whom we must not affect to prescribe. Let him give
kingdoms or flower-leaves indifferently. There are persons from whom we always
expect fairy-tokens; let us not cease to expect them. This is prerogative, and
not to be limited by our municipal rules. For the rest, I like to see that we
cannot be bought and sold. The best of hospitality and of generosity is also not
in the will, but in fate. I find that I am not much to you; you do not need me;
you do not feel me; then am I thrust out of doors, though you proffer me house
and lands. No services are of any value, but only likeness. When I have
attempted to join myself to others by services, it proved an intellectual
trick,-- no more. They eat your service like apples, and leave you out. But love
them, and they feel you and delight in you all the time.
![]() |